DEACON FOR LIFE: Rejecting the Sexual Revolution...EXCEPT...

Wednesday, September 7, 2022

Rejecting the Sexual Revolution...EXCEPT...

One year ago, we released What to Say When: The Complete New Guide to Discussing Abortion! 60,000 copies and countless changed hearts later, you made the book a national best-seller and an Amazon #1 new release--thank you! It's more critical than ever to confidently change hearts and minds on abortion. Get your copy today at 40daysforlife.com/whattosaywhen.

The sexual revolution is responsible for widespread abortion, infanticide, promiscuity, and countless other attacks on life and family.

But most Christians accept the sexual revolution's central plank--contraception--without question.

Is that right?

Hannah Morales, a young pro-life evangelical Christian, always assumed birth control was part of being a responsible married adult...until listening to The 40 Days for Life Podcast changed her mind.

Hannah joined the podcast this week to share her beautiful journey of how prayer, study, and radical trust in God led her and her husband to embrace life in their marriage:

40daysforlife.com/joy-of-saying-no-to-birth-control

Tune in--and then listen to the podcast that changed Hannah's mind about contraception:

40daysforlife.com/contraception-podcast

Autumn is here! That means the September 28-November 6 40 Days for Life campaign is just three weeks away!

Don't wait for day one to get involved. Find your local vigil site and sign up to pray, fast, and save a life by visiting:

40daysforlife.com/location

For life,

Shawn Carney
President/CEO, 40 Days for Life

40 Days for Life 4112 E 29th St. Bryan, Texas 77802 United States (888) LIFE-316

LIFE IS SACRED

An example of the traditional magisterial teaching which indicates that it is never morally licit to intentionally kill a child through abortion in order to “save the life of its mother” comes from the teaching of Pope Pius XII:

“Every human being, even the infant in the mother's womb, has the right to life immediately from God, not from the parent or any human society or authority. Therefore, there is no man, no human authority, no science, no medical, eugenic, social, economic or moral ‘indication’ that can show or give valid juridical title for direct deliberate disposition concerning an innocent human life-which is to say, a disposition that aims at its destruction either as an end in itself or as the means of attaining another end that is perhaps in no way illicit itself. Thus, for example, to save the life of the mother is a most noble end, but the direct killing of the child as a means to this end is not licit.”