It is disconcerting to read Henry Kissinger in the Wall Street Journal
arguing that a failure to “transition to the post-coronavirus order”
could “set the world on fire.” Kissinger is rather vague on precisely
what this post-coronavirus “order” would look like, but as one writer
notes, Kissinger’s long history of friendliness toward China and the
lack of any mention in his article of China’s role in unleashing this
pandemic is hardly comforting.
But
for pro-life and pro-family advocates there are many more reasons to be
worried about a “post-coronavirus order” in any way initiated or guided
by Kissinger or his worldview. Kissinger, after all, is the architect
of NSSM-200, also known as The Kissinger Report.
As I wrote recently, this infamous document quite explicitly made it
official US policy to export population control to developing nations in
the name of protecting the United States’ national security and
financial interests. This Machiavellian document discusses ways the US
government could blanket developing nations with contraceptives (with
nudges and winks about the need to push abortion as well) while making
it look like they are primarily concerned about the welfare of these
nations. . .
