October 10, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Excitement continues to rise among pro-lifers across North America -- and distress among Planned Parenthood advocates -- as the number of rescued babies rises to a total of 114 throughout the 170 communities participating in the 40 Days for Life.
David Bereit, national campaign director for the 40 DFL, writes that peaceful protesters with California's San Fernando Valley chapter of the 40 DFL had some "very encouraging news" to relate. An absent abortionist, unusually low numbers of scheduled abortions, and 40 DFL pilgrims from far and wide were mere preliminaries to the day's excitement, during which at least one woman "changed [her] mind" and left the abortuary smiling.
"When one woman changes her mind about abortion, it creates a ripple [effect]. Heartbreak is replaced by joy -- many times over," says Bereit.
Similar stories are starting to emerge in Canada, where two cities, Ottawa and Halifax, are participating in the 40 DFL. Suzanne Atkinson, a peaceful protester outside the Morgantaler abortion center, records that on Wednesday October 8 she "looked up to see [a] young girl going into 65 Bank St." Reliving the moments intensely, Atkinson says, "My heart sank. I prayed that the Lord would move in her heart... that the guardian angels of her and her unborn baby would intervene." Some time passing before the young woman emerged, Atkinson "assumed that she had had an abortion," but in a brief conversation with the protesters, the young woman admitted to having "changed her mind." She looked "quite happy," said Atkinson.
The widespread success of the 40 DFL is proving a threat to abortion providers, who run a multi-billion dollar industry in North America. (The first half of the 40 DFL has seen successes in more than 50 cities. Find their stories here: http://40daysforlife.com/blog/?p=25.) "Despite the increasingly shrill rhetoric of the abortion industry, the simple truth is that business is off," says Bereit. "Abortion numbers have dropped so significantly that several states are now down to only one or two remaining abortion centers."
Planned Parenthood, which, as the largest supporter and provider of abortion, is a special target for the 40 DFL, is particularly anxious. "Emily X," a Planned Parenthood activist, writes "the things we take for granted - that you can afford to get your birth control each month, or that your doctor will give you all your options when you come to him or her in need - are quietly slipping away. It's an important time. And it's not the time to sit idly by." Emily X attempts to compensate Planned Parenthood for its financial loss throughout the 40 DFL campaign by gaining sponsors for each encounter she has with a 40 DFL protester. Clearly, Planned Parenthood is feeling a pinch.
In anticipation of this autumn's 40 DFL last August 25, Bereit said "We may be on the verge of a turning point in the battle against abortion," and "response to our call for communities to participate in this fall's 40 Days for Life has exceeded our wildest expectations...The growth of this outreach is a reflection of the excitement that people are expressing about the many ways 40 Days for Life impacts a community."
The 40 DFL closing rally is on Sunday, November 2. To participate, go to http://www.40daysforlife.com.
Addressing the American and Canadian Voters from Abroad
"Christians, in particular, must think of what Christ will say to them at the Last Judgement if they support "pro-choice" candidates"
Opinion by By Fr. Lawrence Abello, S.J.
NOTE From LifeSiteNews: Fr. Abello is a Jesuit missionary in Calcutta, India who served as Mother Teresa's chaplain during the latter part of her life. In the years 1985-6, before returning to India, he often witnessed and prayed for hours at the back alley of Henry Morgentaler's abortuary at 85 Harbord Street in Toronto, Canada and was instrumental is saving some mothers and their babies from abortion. The voting opinions expressed in this article sent to LifeSiteNews by Fr. Abello are expressly the opinions of Fr. Abello as LifeSiteNews is a non-partisan life and family issues news service that does give specific candidate or party voting directions.
October 10, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - As the Tuesday, November 4th US Election Day and the October 14 Canadian election approach, you may wonder whether there is an overriding issue that should determine your vote. What is an 'overriding issue'? An overriding issue is so fundamental that, of two candidates, the one who has the more unacceptable position on that issue should not be supported regardless of more acceptable positions on other issues. Let us determine, step by step, whether an overriding issue faces you on either of those election days. My remarks are primarily directed to Americans but the basic principles apply just as much to Canadians.
Was there an overriding issue in 1857 when the "honorable" judges of the U.S. Supreme Court, in the 'Dred-Scott' case, upheld the owner's right to bring slaves across state lines like stray animals? Was there an overriding issue for centuries in India when an "untouchable" could be killed for walking across a Brahm in's shadow? Was there an overriding issue when Lenin and Stalin killed millions as "insects, parasites and vermin"? Was there an overriding issue in 1933 when the Germans voted into power the Nazi Party, with its attractive economic policies, but in spite of Hitler's position that certain categories of people (Jews and others) were 'Unmenschen' (non-humans) who should be exterminated in a holocaust?
As in 1933, so also in 2008 there are several issues that loom large in many people's minds such as the economy and social welfare policies.
I submit to you that the overriding issue is the so-called "legalization" of the abortion holocaust by the Supreme Court in 1973. The reasons for reaching this conclusion are the following:
A) One must be aware that, on January 22nd, 1973, the majority of the "honorable" judges of the U.S. Supreme Court, in the 'Roe v. Wade' and 'Doe v. Bolton' cases, ruled that abortion is "legal" throughout the nine months of pregnancy through accepting, by the latter case, emotional conditions of the mother as justifying abortion at any stage of pregnancy. These judges also added, "We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins" (Roe v. Wade, IX, B, p. 159.)
B) These rulings ushered in a holocaust and a 'relativistic atheism'. That is, one constructs one's own truth to suit one's desires. For example, if one wants the child, 'he' or 'she' is a baby from conception (a test-tube 'baby'), but if one does not want the child, "it" is a blob of protoplasm until birth.
C) Moreover, democracy itself is at stake when Supreme Court Judges, who are not responsible to the people because they are appointed for life, arrogate unto themselves the role of "legislating", instead of merely 'adjudicating'. The majority judges "legislated" from the bench when they concocted 'Roe v. Wade' by reading a "right" to abortion in the Constitution that does not even refer to abortion. What "right" might such Judges read next in the Constitution: euthanasia, same-sex "marriages", or polygamy!
D) Furthermore, besides the atheistic relativism, "pro-choice" is based on a completely materialistic view of human life. "Pro-choicers" cannot even entertain the possibility that the purpose of a human being's life is to prepare now for a 'destiny beyond death'. Their arguments are entirely restricted to a 'this world' view of life. The very thought that abortion terminates a human being's right to grow in sanctity during this life and, thereby, causes the victim to reach the destiny beyond death as a 'spiritual dwarf', elicits such a complete consternation in "pro-choicers" that they usually banish such a thought. But the myopic view that a human being's destiny ends with death divests life of any ultimate meaning. It also eliminates ultimate personal consequences of doing 'good' instead of doing 'evil'. Although many "pro-choicers" retain moral values, what ultimate difference does it make whether one lives a good life, a bad life, or commits suicide if one ends up as only dust after death!
Given the atheistic and materialistic mentalities, along with the threat to democracy that 'Roe v. Wade' has foisted on the nation, I submit to you that the overriding issue is to elect a President who will nominate, and senators who will support the appointment of Supreme Court Judges most likely to overturn 'Roe v. Wade' and 'Doe v. Bolton'. Moreover, this overriding, right-to-life issue also mandates electing members of Congress and Governors who will support pro-life legislation.
What is the stand of the Presidential candidates? Barak Obama went to the extent of voting against the Bill prohibiting 'partial birth abortion'. As President he would reverse the present 'Mexico City Policy' prohibiting U.S. tax money from being diverted to promote abortion abroad. Reversing this policy would promote 'female feticide' by the hundreds of thousands in many Asian countries- an 'extremist feminists' Frankenstein' for those who want to uphold women's "rights" by supporting "legalized" abortion!
Obama is the typical, "pro-choice" relativistic atheist constructing his own truth. When Pastor Warren asked the two presidential candidates at what stage protection of human life must begin, John McCain answered 'at conception', whereas, Obama tried to confuse the issue by claiming that the question has both theological and scientific dimensions. He concluded that the answer is above his pay grade.
Later on, he admitted that he had given a flippant answer. For Obama the truth is not determined by reality but can be twisted and turned to suit his purposes in different situations. If Obama cannot answer from what stage human life must be protected, how can he be so adamant in pursuing policies that afford no protection to the preborn child!
For example, in the Illinois legislature, Obama even voted against an anti-infanticide bill (the 'Born-Alive Infants Protection Act') demanding care for babies surviving abortion. Besides, on the 35th anniversary of 'Roe v. Wade' (Jan. 22nd 2008), Obama stated that, as President, he would sign the 'Freedom of Choice Act', which would overrule all restrictions on abortion by codifying 'Roe v. Wade'. Cf. the website given below. His vice-presidential candidate, Joe Biden, is also a pro-abortion activist.
Cf. http://www.barackobama.com/2008/01/22/obama_statement_on_35th_annive.php
Furthermore, to uphold 'Roe v. Wade' and 'Doe v. Bolton', Obama would nominate revisionist Supreme Court Judges with their threat to democracy.
Let us pray that, in spite of perhaps unacceptable stands on lesser issues, voters will give the candidates' stands on abortion the highest priority. John McCain, has a straight voting record against abortion and has promised to nominate constructionist Supreme Court Judges. Moreover, his vice-presidential candidate, Sarah Palin, gave birth to their youngest child diagnosed before birth as having 'Down's Syndrome'. This 'choice' speaks volumes for her pro-life credentials. Furthermore, in sharp contrast to Obama, who professed he would not punish his daughters with an unplanned baby, the Palin family accepted their daughter's child, conceived outside wedlock.
Generally, Republicans are less 'pro-abortion' or more 'pro-life' than Democrats, as their respective 'pro-life' and 'pro-abortion' platforms, finalized in their Conventions, show. Yes, many voters view Republicans with disaffection and, besides, there are issues other than abortion, such as the war and the current severe financial crisis. However, even the Iraq war does not entail accepting a court ruling or law maintaining that everyone is free to decide whether Iraqis are humans or non-humans. Unlike abortionists who are paid and praised for killing their victims, those who abused inmates in the Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad were brought to justice.
Above all, the right to life is the fundamental right in the sense that you lose all rights if someone kills you. Try to obtain information on the stand of the candidates for the Senate, for Congress and for Governorship on the overriding issue of this election. If you cannot obtain this information, given that the Democratic Party, as a whole, tends to be more pro abortion, the better bet in many cases may be to vote Republican.
In the above, I have not appealed to any religion. Christians, in particular, must think of what Christ will say to them at the Last Judgement if they support "pro-choice" candidates: "Not only was I hungry and thirsty, but I was being killed and you elected those who promoted that killing"! (Cf. Matthew's Gospel, 25:41-46.)
Above all on election day vote and do so to protect the most fundamental right of every human being, the right to life without which no other right or freedom has any meaning. Everybody's duty is to protect everyone's life beginning with the weakest whose rights are the most likely to be violated.
Obama News Highlights - October 11, 2008
* Disclaimer: The linked items below or the websites at which they are located do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.com. They are presented only for your information.
Farrakhan on Obama: 'The Messiah is absolutely speaking' - WorldNetDaily
Says to youth, "You are the instruments that God is going to use to bring about universal change, and that is why Barack has captured the youth. And he has involved young people in a political process that they didn't care anything about. That's a sign. When the Messiah speaks, the youth will hear, and the Messiah is absolutely speaking."
"Brothers and sisters," Farrakhan said, "Barack Obama to me, is a herald of the Messiah. Barack Obama is like the trumpet that alerts you something new, something better is on the way."
Farrakhan points out that the man Nation of Islam followers refer to as "the Savior," Fard Muhammad, had a black father and a white mother, just as Obama did. "Brothers and sisters," Farrakhan said, "Barack Obama to me, is a herald of the Messiah. Barack Obama is like the trumpet that alerts you something new, something better is on the way."
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=77539
The Coming Obama Thugocracy - Attempts to shut down political speech have become routine for liberals - Townhall
Obama fans jammed WGN's phone lines and sent in hundreds of protest emails. The message was clear to anyone who would follow Rosenberg's example. We will make trouble for you if you let anyone make the case against The One. Other Obama supporters have threatened critics with criminal prosecution.
http://townhall.com/columnists/MichaelBarone/2008/10/11/the_coming_obama_thugocracy
Mainstream Media Ignore Obama's Radical Abortion Record - NewsBusters
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew-balan/2008/10/10/mainstream-media-ignore-obama-s-radical-abortion-record
The Tuesday debate between Senators McCain and Obama was, it must be admitted, something of a bore by Richard John Neuhaus, First Things
http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/?p=1194
De-Fund ACORN, Republican Leader Insists
http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=37232
When Do Our Rights Begin, Revisited - Obama says he doesn't know and his votes prove it.
http://www.cwalac.org/article_768.shtml
Obama-Biden Judicial Litmus Test Exposed, But Who Cares?
http://www.cwalac.org/article_771.s
Obama's False Ayers
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/5455
"Pro-choice" vs. "Pro-abortion"? Or, "Pro-choice" = "Pro-abortion"? Obama said to be pro-choice rather than pro-abortion.
http://insightscoop.typepad.com/2004/2008/10/pro-choice-vs-p.html
Palin drubs Obama on abortion during Pa. rally
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081011/ap_on_el_pr/palin
* Disclaimer: The linked items below or the websites at which they are located do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.com. They are presented only for your information.
The Five Non-Negotiables
http://insightscoop.typepad.com/2004/2008/10/the-five-non-ne.html
Fr. McBrien and the mythological "one issue bishops"
http://insightscoop.typepad.com/2004/2008/10/fr-mcbrien-and.html
Young Catholics not turning to sanctity of life and marriage as voting issues, poll finds
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=14008
Will the Church Split Along Red and Blue Lines? by Deal W. Hudson -List of 40 bishops who have made public statements about Catholics in politics in this election
http://insidecatholic.com/Joomla/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4663&Itemid=48
Supreme Court Denies Review Of Several Abortion-Related Cases - Most rulings against the pro-life position.
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/124628.php
Smithsonian 'Celebrates' Eugenicist Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger
http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=37155
Philippines, women's movement with the Church in the "fight for life"
http://www.asianews.it/index.php?l=en&art=13445&size=A
The best get convictions; the worst get medals - A Canadian woman has spent nearly half of the last 14 years in jail as a prisoner of conscience. Why doesn't she have a medal?
http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/the_best_get_convictions_the_worst_get_medals/
The Messy, Messy Business of Birth Control
http://insightscoop.typepad.com/2004/2008/10/the-messy-messy.html
Ecuador's labyrinth of nebulous ambiguity - Now that the new president has his politically correct constitution, what will he do with it?
http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/ecuadors_labyrinth_of_nebulous_ambiguity/
Halloween Unmasked
http://www.newoxfordreview.org/article.jsp?did=1008-brown
Indian activist: Massacre of Christians planned in advance
http://www.asianews.it/index.php?l=en&art=13449&size=A
Islamic fundamentalists: "expel Christians from Mosul"
http://www.asianews.it/index.php?l=en&art=13442&size=A
Maurice Strong, The U.N.'s Man of Mystery - Is the godfather of the Kyoto treaty a public servant or a profiteer?
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122368007369524679.html
The Government Is Contributing to the Panic. It's time to let markets do their messy work.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122367942018324645.html
Crisis marks out a new geopolitical order. For more than two centuries, the US and Europe have exercised an effortless economic, political and cultural hegemony. That era is ending.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0ed4a750-961e-11dd-9dce-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1
Switzerland's Green Power Revolution: Ethicists Ponder Plants' Rights - Who Is to Say Flora Don't Have Feelings? Figuring Out What Wheat Would Want
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122359549477921201.html?mod=todays_us_nonsub_page_one
Rejecting the Act, Not the Man - CWFA on homosexuality
http://www.cwfa.org/articles/15870/BLI/commentary/index.htm
30 lesbians impregnated by the same man
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,24467919-1246,00.html
Chicago to Create Tax-Funded High School for Homosexual and Transgender Students
http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=37214
Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to http://www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.
Donate to LifeSiteNews.com at http://www.lifesitenews.com/donate/
