DEACON FOR LIFE

Were there to be no support in the whole history of ethical and moral thought, were there no acknowledged confirmation from medical science, were the history of legal opinion to the contrary, we would still have to conclude on the basis of God's Holy Word that the unborn child is a person in the sight of God. He is protected by the sanctity of life graciously given to each individual by the Creator, Who alone places His image upon man and grants them any right to life which they have.

Wednesday, May 23, 2018

OPINION: China to End Two Child Policy? Don't Celebrate Yet!

CONTACT:            Reggie Littlejohn
EMAIL: reggielittlejohn@gmail.com
CELL: 310.592.5722
WEBSITE:   www.womensrightswithoutfrontiers.org

OPINION:  China to End the Two-Child Policy?  Don’t Celebrate Yet!
According to a Bloombergreport, anonymous sources have stated that the State Council (China’s Cabinet) has commissioned research on the impact of ending China’s two-child policy, possibly within the next year. “The leadership wants to reduce the pace of aging in China’s population and remove a source of international criticism,” one of these sources said.

Having dedicated the last ten years of my life to mounting “international criticism” aimed at ending forced abortion and gendercide in China, I would of course rejoice over the end of all coercive birth limits in China.  This would be a momentous victory for human rights and a vindication of the application of international pressure as a strategy to affect change within that totalitarian regime.

But I am holding off on this celebration.  First, the Chinese government just commissioned a study.  It has not yet enacted the new law.  I hope it does.   Doing so would be a momentous step in the right direction.

As always when dealing with the Chinese Communist Party, there is a catch.  The Bloomberg article states that “China is planning to scrap all limits on the number of children a family can have . . .”  Many of the abortions in China are performed on unmarried women.  China will not release how many of its 23 million abortions a year are forced.

According to the most recent report of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China, China’s Family Planning Laws require couples to be married to have children.   The implementation of the Family Planning Laws is not uniform across China, but is subject to provincial regulation.  In some places, an unmarried woman who is pregnant may be forced to pay a “social compensation fee” of up to ten times her annual salary.  I call these “terror fines.”  If she cannot pay the fine, she may be required to abort.  Yue Zhang spoke bravely and eloquently about her tragic experience of late term forced abortion because she became pregnant without being married.

In some instances, the “illegal children” of unmarried women are raised in secret.  They are denied hukou, without which they may be denied birth certificates and are not eligible for healthcare, education, or passports.  They cannot officially marry, work or travel.  They are illegal in their own land.

These questions remain:  Will China “scrap” birth limits for all women, not just married women?  Will they dispense with the system of social compensation fees for “illegal births”?  Will they abolish the hukousystem?

In the United States, the percentage of all births to unmarried women is 39.8%.  The unmarried women of China must be free to give birth as well.  And the children of unmarried women should have full rights of citizenship.

Further, the abolition of coercive birth limits will not end gendercide in China.  Many couples in China choose to have small families. Many do not want a second child, because of limited resources of time and money.  Because strong son preference remains, baby girls will continue to be selectively aborted and abandoned; people want their only child, or one of their two children, to be a boy.  Second daughters, therefore, remain especially vulnerable, even with the abolition of coercive birth limits.

And what of the devastating legacy of the One Child (now Two Child) Policy?  Tens of millions of men will never marry because their future wives were selectively eliminated.  And regarding the rapidly aging population, babies born now will not enter the work force for decades.  In the meantime, many elderly are without support and senior suicide is on the rise.

So I am holding off on celebrating an end to forced abortion and gendercide in China.  When that day truly arrives, I will rejoice that the most disastrous social experiment in the history of the world has been cast onto the dung heap of history, where it belongs.

Related Links

China Considers Ending Birth Limits as Soon as This Year 5/21/18
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-21/china-said-to-consider-ending-birth-limits-as-soon-as-this-year

Forced Abortion Still Mandated Under China’s “Planned Birth” Laws 1/15/18
https://www.pop.org/forced-abortion-still-mandated-chinas-planned-birth-laws/

2017 Congressional-Executive Commission on China “Population Control” section
https://www.cecc.gov/publications/annual-reports/2017-annual-report

2017 State Department Country Reports of Human Rights Practices – China
https://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/humanrightsreport/index.htm#wrapper

Continued Coercion: China’s Two-Child Policy Threatens Human Rights and Prosperity 3/8/17
https://www.heritage.org/event/continued-coercion-chinas-two-child-policy-threatens-human-rights-and-prosperity

Full Testimony of Yue Zhang 3/7/17
http://www.womensrightswithoutfrontiers.org/blog/china-late-term-forced-abortion-victim-speaks-out-for-international-womens-day/

Suicide Among Elderly Increases 8/4/14
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2014-08/04/content_18239837.htm

--

Reggie Littlejohn, President
Women's Rights Without Frontiers
www.womensrightswithoutfrontiers.org
Stop Forced Abortion – China’s War on Women! Video (4 mins)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjtuBcJUsjY

LIFE IS SACRED

An example of the traditional magisterial teaching which indicates that it is never morally licit to intentionally kill a child through abortion in order to “save the life of its mother” comes from the teaching of Pope Pius XII:

“Every human being, even the infant in the mother's womb, has the right to life immediately from God, not from the parent or any human society or authority. Therefore, there is no man, no human authority, no science, no medical, eugenic, social, economic or moral ‘indication’ that can show or give valid juridical title for direct deliberate disposition concerning an innocent human life-which is to say, a disposition that aims at its destruction either as an end in itself or as the means of attaining another end that is perhaps in no way illicit itself. Thus, for example, to save the life of the mother is a most noble end, but the direct killing of the child as a means to this end is not licit.”