Press Release Contact: Karen Malec, 847-421-4000 Date: March 9, 2010
Women's Group Rebukes Obama, Reid, Pelosi
The Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer today sharply rebuked President Obama, Senator Harry Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and others in Congress for aggressively pursuing an effort to include an abortion mandate in healthcare reform, despite having been informed of overwhelming evidence showing the U.S. National Cancer Institute deliberately misled women with its 2003 workshop that purported to conduct a "comprehensive review" of an abortion-breast cancer (ABC) link. [1] On January 20, 2010, the Coalition sent a letter to Obama and members of Congress which notified them of the NCI's misconduct and called for a Congressional investigation of the agency. [2]
"It is despicable that Obama and others in Congress are striving to force taxpayers to pay for abortions, even though an abortion mandate would result in more breast cancer deaths and premature births among women with abortions," said Karen Malec, president of the Coalition. "Obviously, they don't care if women die and babies develop cerebral palsy.
"The NCI has declared the ABC link 'non-existent,' but research last year by NCI branch chief Louise Brinton revealed that she and her colleagues at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center are convinced the link exists (and they found that women using oral contraceptives have a four-fold increased risk of the deadly triple-negative breast cancer). [5] Three studies last year (and dozens of studies since 1957) reported an ABC link. [3-5] Additionally, medical texts admit that childbearing sharply reduces breast cancer risk. No one can deny that abortion causes women to lose that protective effect.
"Three systematic reviews and meta-analyses last year confirmed a link between abortion and premature birth. [6-8] The Institute of Medicine identifies abortion as a risk factor for premature birth. [9] Premature birth puts babies at risk for neonatal death, cerebral palsy, mental retardation, epilepsy and difficulties walking, seeing and hearing."
"Why do Obama, Reid and Pelosi hate women and children? Terrorists have not caused as many injuries and deaths among the American people, as have abortion enthusiasts in our government and the abortion industry," charged Malec.
The Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer is an international women's organization founded to protect the health and save the lives of women by educating and providing information on abortion as a risk factor for breast cancer.
References:
1. The U.S. National Cancer Institute's 2003 workshop on the abortion-breast cancer link was entitled, "Early Reproductive Events and Breast Cancer."
2. See the Coalition's press releases of January 6 and January 25, 2010 discussing the National Cancer Institute's misconduct at: http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/press_releases/100106/index.htm http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/press_releases/100125/index.htm
3. Ozmen V, Ozcinar B, Karanlik H, et al. Breast cancer risk factors in Turkish women—a university hospital based nested case control study. Wld J Surg Oncol 2009;7:37-44.
4. Xing P. Li J, Jin F. A case-control study of reproductive factors with subtypes of breast cancer in northeast China. Med Oncol 2009 epub, Humana Press.
5. Dolle JM, Daling JR, White E, Brinton LA, et al. Risk factors for triple-negative breast cancer in women under the age of 45 years. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18:1157-66. Available at: http://www.jillstanek.com/Abortion%20Breast%20Cancer%20Epid%20Bio%20Prev%202009.pdf
6. Shah P. et al. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009;;116(11):1425-1442. Available at: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122591273/abstract
7. Swingle HM, et al. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 2009;;54:95- 108.
8. Van Oppenraaij RHF et al. Human Reproduction Update Advance Access 7 March 2009;;1(a):1- 13. Available at: http://humupd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/15/4/409
9. Richard E. Behrman, et al. Preterm birth: Causes, Consequences and Prevention. Institute of Medicine. Appendix B, Table 5, p. 519. Available at: http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11622&page=625. |
Were there to be no support in the whole history of ethical and moral thought, were there no acknowledged confirmation from medical science, were the history of legal opinion to the contrary, we would still have to conclude on the basis of God's Holy Word that the unborn child is a person in the sight of God. He is protected by the sanctity of life graciously given to each individual by the Creator, Who alone places His image upon man and grants them any right to life which they have.