If you want to see what happens when a
society enthusiastically swallows the euthanasia poison, look at
Belgium. Perhaps influenced by its neighbor the Netherlands — which pioneered euthanasia permissiveness — Belgium legalized euthanasia in 2002. The country has since leaped head-first off a vertical moral cliff.
As usual, when the law was being debated,
supporters described it as being strictly limited to those at the end
of life for whom nothing else but killing would adequately alleviate
suffering. That is definitely not how things have worked out.
The international media usually ignore
euthanasia and assisted suicide abuses. But even the complacent Fourth
Estate couldn’t ignore the joint euthanasia deaths of disabled Belgian
identical twins named Marc and Eddy Verbessem.
Neither of the brothers had contracted a
terminal illness. Nor were they in physical pain. Rather, having been
born deaf, and at age 45, both were progressively losing their eyesight.
As the Telegraph reported, “The pair told doctors that they
were unable to bear the thought of being unable to see each other
again.” When their own doctor wouldn’t kill them, they found their
executioner in one Dr. David Dufour, who calmly and coolly told a television newscast:
They had a cup of coffee in the hall, it went well and a rich conversation. Then they separation from their parents and [each] brother was very serene and beautiful. At the last there was a little wave of their hands and then they were gone.
In a morally sane society, Dufour would
lose his license to practice medicine and be tried for homicide. But
Belgium apparently no longer fits that description.
Perhaps the Verbessem lethal injections
should not surprise us. In the last few years, euthanasia consciousness
has bored deeply into Belgian societal bone marrow.
Joint Euthanasia Deaths of Elderly Couples.
At least two elderly couples who didn’t want to live apart have also
been reported. The first was in 2011 — and apparently the local
community knew about the plan and approved. They even made their final
arrangements at the local mortuary before being killed. The couple’s
demise was celebrated by a Belgian bioethicist who said: “It is an
important signal to break a taboo,” adding, “This is a beautiful example
that allows us to provide a dignified death to this couple, thanks to
euthanasia.” Most societies see joint suicides by elderly couples as
tragic. In Belgium, apparently, they are ‘beautiful.’
Euthanasia After Sexual Exploitation by Psychiatrist: Bioedge
recently posted a story, taken from Belgian news reports, about the
euthanasia of “Ann G.” Ann was a suicidal anorexia patient who publicly
accused her previous psychiatrist of persuading her into sexual
relations. When the psychiatrist — who admitted the charge — was not
severely disciplined, Ann went to a second psychiatrist for euthanasia.
She died at age 44.
Euthanasia for a Botched Sex Change:
Nathan Verhelst underwent a sex change surgery from woman to man, and
then was euthanized because of despair over the result. From the Daily Mail story:
A Belgian transsexual has chosen to die by euthanasia after a botched sex change operation to complete his transformation into a man left him a ‘monster’. Nathan Verhelst, 44, died yesterday afternoon after being allowed have his life ended on the grounds of "unbearable psychological suffering" . . . In the hours before his death he told Belgium’s Het Laatse Nieuws: "I was ready to celebrate my new birth. But when I looked in the mirror, I was disgusted with myself."
So, Dufour — the same doctor who killed the disabled twins — killed him! Words rarely fail me. But they do here.
Euthanasia and Organ Harvesting of the Disabled:
The joining of voluntary euthanasia and organ harvesting in Belgium
first came to light in a 2008. The doctors who removed the woman’s
organs after her death published a letter in the medical journal, Transplantation,
reporting that a totally paralyzed woman first asked for euthanasia —
permission granted — and then to donate her organs after her heart
stopped.
Since this first known case, other euthanasia killings followed by organ harvesting have been reported. In 2009, Transplantation Proceedings
published an article entitled, “Organ Procurement After Euthanasia:
Belgian Experience,” in which doctors described euthanasia accompanied
by organ harvests from disabled patients in clinical detail.
Euthanasia and organ donation has now expanded to include at least one patient with a severe mental illness. As reported in “Initial Experience with Transplantation of Lungs,” published in 2011 Applied Cardiopulmonary Pathophysiology (PDF), four patients (three disabled and one mentally ill) were euthanized and their lungs harvested.
By joining euthanasia with organ donation, Belgium crossed a very dangerous bridge by giving society a utilitarian stake in euthanasia. But the acceptance of joint killing and harvesting also sends the cruel message to disabled, or mentally ill people: “Your deaths have greater value than your lives.”
In such a milieu, self-justifying bromides about “choice” and the
“voluntary” nature “of the process” become mere rationalization.
What’s next for Belgium? Euthanasia for children! — currently being debated
in the Parliament and expected to become law. But why be surprised?
Once killing is accepted as an answer to human difficulty and suffering,
the power of sheer logic dictates that there is no bottom.
CBC Special consultant, Wesley J. Smith, is a senior fellow at the Discovery Institute’s Center on Human Exceptionalism and a consultant for the Patients Rights Council.
