The following comes from an Aug. 20 story in the Christian Post.
Fertility difference even larger since late 1970s
Americans are becoming more pro-life because pro-lifers have more babies than pro-choicers, a new study finds.
Looking
at data from the General Social Survey from 1977 to 2010, Northwestern
University sociologists J. Alex Kevern and Jeremy Freese found evidence
that the higher fertility rates of those who are pro-life compared to
those who are pro-choice contributed to Americans becoming, on average,
more pro-life than they would have been if the fertility differential
did not exist.
Over
the 34-year time span that was studied, pro-lifers had about 2.5
children on average for every two children born to pro-choicers. In
other words, pro-lifers had 27 percent more children than pro-choicers.
In
addition to having more children, the children of pro-life parents
appear to be more likely than the children of pro-choice parents to adopt the views of their parents. Kevern
and Freese pointed to prior research showing this and found some
evidence for this finding in their own study. They point out, though,
that the differences in the transmission of beliefs from parent to child
could be due to cultural shifts rather than differences between
pro-choice and pro-life parents.
The
researchers also acknowledged that those with more siblings may be more
likely to hold pro-life views independent of the views of their
parents, but they had no way to test that hypothesis.
The
researchers conservatively estimate that if there were no fertility
differences between pro-lifers and pro-choicers, Americans would be, on
average, about five percentage points less pro-life.
The fertility differential between pro-lifers and pro-choicers has grown
even larger since the late 1970s, the study points out. So, if the
impact of those differences on abortion attitudes continue as they have,
the effect will likely be even larger in the future.
Fertility differences is
only one factor, Kevern and Freese point out, driving shifts in public
opinion. Attitudes on gay rights, for instance, show similar fertility
differences as abortion attitudes. Yet, there has been a dramatic change
in support for gay marriage. While fertility differences can make small
differences over a long period of time, cultural shifts (people
changing their mind) can be large and happen in a short period of time.
Any fertility advantage held by supporters of traditional marriage was
swamped by the rapid and large shift in views on gay marriage.
To read the original story, click here.
From http://cal-catholic.com/