- Bioethics hates the light?
- Infant euthanasia: blaze of controversy revisited
- Rhode Island signs same sex 'marriage' into law
- Outrage over euthanasia advocate Philip Nitschke and killing machine
Posted: 05 May 2013 04:28 AM PDT
Last
year, the Journal of Medical Ethics–a reliable fount of
radicalism–published an article promoting “after-birth” abortion, e.g.,
infanticide–as an ethical action. It sparked a firestorm, and I was one
of the match lighters, along with the clearing house of bioethical
articles and news, Bioedge.
|
Posted: 05 May 2013 04:23 AM PDT
“If
criteria such as the costs (social, psychological, economic) for the
potential parents are good enough reasons for having an abortion even
when the fetus is healthy, if the moral status of the newborn is the
same as that of the foetus and if neither has any moral value by virtue
of being a potential person, then the same reasons which justify
abortion should also justify the killing of the potential person when it
is at the stage of a newborn.”
|
Posted: 05 May 2013 04:02 AM PDT
Rhode
Island governor Lincoln Chafee has signed a law redefining “marriage”
to include homosexual couples, making Rhode Island the tenth state to
accept same-sex “marriages.”
|
Posted: 05 May 2013 02:16 AM PDT
Dr
Nitschke staged a Dying Well in the West workshop in Wembley yesterday,
where he showcased his $660 nitrogen gas product. Australian Medical
Association president Richard Choong condemned the man dubbed Dr Death.
"He's teaching people how to commit suicide."
|