|
Lila Rose, the president of Live Action, featured on the February 20, 2014 episode of the Christian Broadcasting Network’s The Brody File.
Calling her a “pro-life prodigy,” Brody joined Rose in Minneapolis,
Minnesota, where she spoke to students at Sacred Heart Catholic School
about the need to play an active part in the “spiritual battle” against
the evil of abortion. Read more...
|
So, only women “need” this right? Men have no say on when life
begins? I suppose that does make it easier to allow only mothers to kill
their children, if only mothers have the right to decide when a child
is a life and when one is a “non-life” – or whatever else you might call
a growing, developing human reproduced by your human body. Read more...
|
 'Heartbeat' bill aims to protect unborn children in Alabama
The bill was read last week and referred to the House of
Representatives Committee on Health. HB 490 is sponsored by pro-life
Rep. Mary Sue McClurkin (R-Pelham), who made news last year by
sponsoring the law which required physicians to have admitting
privileges at hospitals if they performed abortions. HB 490 would make
abortion more limited, since a heartbeat can be detected at about 7-8
weeks, before many abortions are often performed. Read more...
|
George Jonas: Abortion should be legal even though it's killing and an "abomination"
He breaks down a lot of the common pro-abortion arguments, talking
about how women are the ones who choose to undergo actions which lead
to pregnancy and how people already break laws anyway, and he
acknowledges the personhood of the unborn. He admits that abortion is
killing a person. Yet he believes that it should be legal anyway. Why? Read more...
|
 Paging Mr. Science Guy...embryology denialism is in desperate need of debunking
As a Christian who has no quarrel with evolution and no investment
in the idea of a 6,000-year-old Earth, I didn’t feel the need to tune
in (personally, my view is that the subject is usually debated in a
rabbit hole that distracts from the real lessons people should take
away). But so far, the most important aspect of Nye v. Ham has been
overlooked – which misconceptions our Arbiters of Real Science feel
compelled to champion, and which ones they’re content to let stand. Read more...
|
Other Articles
|
|
|
|
