Were there to be no support in the whole history of ethical and moral thought, were there no acknowledged confirmation from medical science, were the history of legal opinion to the contrary, we would still have to conclude on the basis of God's Holy Word that the unborn child is a person in the sight of God. He is protected by the sanctity of life graciously given to each individual by the Creator, Who alone places His image upon man and grants them any right to life which they have.
Friday, February 21, 2014
Pro-Life Prodigy Battles to Save the Culture of Life
Lila Rose, the president of Live Action, featured on the February 20, 2014 episode of the Christian Broadcasting Network’s The Brody File.
Calling her a “pro-life prodigy,” Brody joined Rose in Minneapolis,
Minnesota, where she spoke to students at Sacred Heart Catholic School
about the need to play an active part in the “spiritual battle” against
the evil of abortion. Read more...
So, only women “need” this right? Men have no say on when life
begins? I suppose that does make it easier to allow only mothers to kill
their children, if only mothers have the right to decide when a child
is a life and when one is a “non-life” – or whatever else you might call
a growing, developing human reproduced by your human body. Read more...
'Heartbeat' bill aims to protect unborn children in AlabamaThe bill was read last week and referred to the House of
Representatives Committee on Health. HB 490 is sponsored by pro-life
Rep. Mary Sue McClurkin (R-Pelham), who made news last year by
sponsoring the law which required physicians to have admitting
privileges at hospitals if they performed abortions. HB 490 would make
abortion more limited, since a heartbeat can be detected at about 7-8
weeks, before many abortions are often performed. Read more...
As a Christian who has no quarrel with evolution and no investment
in the idea of a 6,000-year-old Earth, I didn’t feel the need to tune
in (personally, my view is that the subject is usually debated in a
rabbit hole that distracts from the real lessons people should take
away). But so far, the most important aspect of Nye v. Ham has been
overlooked – which misconceptions our Arbiters of Real Science feel
compelled to champion, and which ones they’re content to let stand. Read more...